Tax cuts should come from a reduction in the Social Security tax. Congress
has used this surplus for years to give the gigantic tax cuts to the Rich in
the Reagan era when they cut taxes from 70% to 28%. So now as the Big Money
Republican Oil Barons keep socking it to middle class Americans at the gas
pumps, we need to pay back some of our middle class workers by cutting the
Social Security tax in half. We need to uncap the contribution from the
rich, they have never paid their fair share for the benefits their rich
widows have taken out of the system forever. It is these rich guys that
throw out their first wives, and they live to be 100 on Social Security of
$16,000 per year, then their second or third wives chow down on Social
Security as well as they live 50 years beyond their husband collecting for
their children and themselves as well.
It is time to put some of the general surplus back into the Social Security
program and then by cutting the rates in half, the true cost to the worker
may be more equitable while the general surplus picks up the benefits for
the Rich guys widows, the children and the disabled. Afterall the Reagan
people used the Social Security money to finance the rich, it is time to
give it back. This indeed would be the type of tax cut for middle class
Americans that is long overdue. Afterall it is the information provided by
the Greedy Republican websites (www.taxfoundation.org) that lets a person
know that while the rich are now bringing home hundreds of millions, 75% of
Americans average only $20,000 in AGI in 1997.
–
Gary Lantz
"Gary Lantz" <garl…@defnet.com> wrote:
>Tax cuts should come from a reduction in the Social Security tax.
We gotta keep sending out all those welfare checks to the liberals on
the first of every month.
Pointing out the other political parties’
scandles makes you a loyalist. Making
excuses for your own parties scandles
makes you an idiot. Being disgusted with
government dishonesty makes you an
American. Failure to demand government
adherence to Constitutional principles,
dishoners your ancesters. Failure to
defend youself makes you a Liberal.
A Liberal that starts fighting back
becomes a Conservative.
Gary,
Where’s the bite? The intensity? The juvenile potty talk? The
shameless ditto-baiting? Not one word about Rush or his lovely wife’s
sexcapades. This post actually makes rational sense! You’re slipping!
In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Gary Lantz <garl…@defnet.com> wrote:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> Tax cuts should come from a reduction in the Social Security tax. Congress
> has used this surplus for years to give the gigantic tax cuts to the Rich in
> the Reagan era when they cut taxes from 70% to 28%. So now as the Big Money
> Republican Oil Barons keep socking it to middle class Americans at the gas
> pumps, we need to pay back some of our middle class workers by cutting the
> Social Security tax in half. We need to uncap the contribution from the
> rich, they have never paid their fair share for the benefits their rich
> widows have taken out of the system forever. It is these rich guys that
> throw out their first wives, and they live to be 100 on Social Security of
> $16,000 per year, then their second or third wives chow down on Social
> Security as well as they live 50 years beyond their husband collecting for
> their children and themselves as well.
> It is time to put some of the general surplus back into the Social Security
> program and then by cutting the rates in half, the true cost to the worker
> may be more equitable while the general surplus picks up the benefits for
> the Rich guys widows, the children and the disabled. Afterall the Reagan
> people used the Social Security money to finance the rich, it is time to
> give it back. This indeed would be the type of tax cut for middle class
> Americans that is long overdue. Afterall it is the information provided by
> the Greedy Republican websites (www.taxfoundation.org) that lets a person
> know that while the rich are now bringing home hundreds of millions, 75% of
> Americans average only $20,000 in AGI in 1997.
> —
> Gary Lantz
–
+———————————————–+
Mike Hartigan <m…@hartigan.dot.com>
It just goes to show you