- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

> Are n’t you helping them with your Racism ?
>  Read below

> USCensor

> ARE THE ROTHSCHILD BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY?
> By: Efraim Menashe

> Jerusalem, Israel–It isn’t easy being a conspiracy researcher- let
> alone a Jewish conspiracy researcher- when so many Jews are involved
> in political intrigue and world domination. This is a fact any
> objective thinker must conclude- whether the researcher is a Jew or
> not. As a Jew, the decision is harder to accept.

> But I guess I am an objective thinker before I am a Jew, and for that
> reason I am prepared to publicly admit to all who are reading that
> indeed, there is a conspiracy to control and dominate the world, and
> that many, many Jews play, and have played a role, in that conspiracy.
> For this is not speculation, it is fact. The names are well known to
> all:  Rothschild, Warburg, George Soros, Henry Kissinger, the
> Bronfmans, Jacob Shiff, Bernard Baruch, Judah Benjamin, etc. However,
> one must remember that included in the conspiracy are also the
> Rockefellers, J.P. Morgan, Cecil Rhodes, the British Royal Family, the
> Vatican, the French and Italian members of the "NWO planning
> committee." Most of the players in the NWO arena are not Jews, if all
> the members are included.

> The problem is that for some reason only the Rothschilds are
> associated with being behind the creation of "the Illuminati." All the
> conspiracy literature points the sole finger at this family for
> creating the Illuminati and causing revolutions in France, Russia, the
> US, the murder of Lincoln, the creation of the Federal Reserve, the
> crash of l929, the Bank of England, two World Wars: in fact,
> everything that supposedly happens in the NWO is carried out via
> "agents of Rothschild." It is quite amazing how every conspiracy
> researcher whether it is Tex Marrs, David Icke, Guradas, Ralph
> Epperson, Eustice Mullins, John Coleman, it doesn’t matter from which
> perspective they came to understand the grand conspiracy, they all
> agree on one thing that is that the "Rothschilds who are behind
> everything."

> The Schiffs, the Warburgs, Bernard Baruch, are said to be "agents of
> Rothschilds" but this may only mean that no other higher chain of
> command has been identified. None of these so-called agents ever
> admitted to being an agent, nor do we really know if they were. The
> way the conspiracy is described in the revisionist view of history, it
> is just assumed that they are, as it is assumed that the Rothschilds
> are behind the creation of the Illuminati. I have yet to see any proof
> that this is the case. I am not suggesting that the Rothschilds are
> not players in the NWO, only that they are far from being the only
> ones and it has never been shown by any conspiracy researcher that
> they are indeed, "Chairmen of the Board."

    The Rothschilds had more wealth and power than many entire European
nations. At the root of the problem is the money system.

          The money system we have today is called the debt-money system. It
is evil and needs to be replaced. The only way money comes into existance
today is when it is borrowed. There is no fiixed money supply, but only
borrowed money that needs to be paid back to bankers with interest. If all
the money that was owed to bankers was ever paid back there would be no
money left in circulation and this would be a great depression. What makes
matters even worse is that when money is created only the principle of the
loan is created. The money needed to pay the interest is never created. For
this reason it is impossible to pay back the principle plus the interest on
all of the loans that make up our money supply. The extra amount of money
needed to pay the interest was never created and does not exist.

     The United States government borrows money from the Federal Reserve
Bank. This bank is not federal but owned by private stockholders. Other
banks also create the money in our money supply. They are allowed to loan
out much more money then they actually have. Thus they create new money. No
one else is allowed to create money, only bankers have this privilege. All
of our money is debt-money and it is all owed back to bankers, plus the
interest.

       In the U.S.A. money is created by the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing which is a unit of the treasury, but the orders to print come from
the Federal Reserve Banks. The money is created for and owned by the banks.
And the Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal, in spite of the name.
Privately owned commercial banks own the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks.
The Federal Reserve Banks give the newly created money to the government in
exchange for government bonds. To simplify: The United States does not make
its own money. Bankers create the money and loan it to the United States
with an interest charge.

       The book War Cycles Peace Cycles puts it  this way:

        "If there is only $10 in existance, and you lend it to someone under
the condition that he repay $11, and if he agrees to this, he has agreed to
the impossible."

      The book  The Struggle forWorld Power put it this way:

      "The Bank of England… was the first payment institution which was
legally empowered to issue state-authorized paper currency and , therefore,
the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not only renounced
its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to borrow the
privately-created money from the bankers…Not only the thing being done,
but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and deception to conceal the
essence of the deed. To create money out of nothing is to make valid and
effective claim on all goods and services for no return, which is fraud and
theft, made worse by the circumstances that the money is lent out at
interest…it follows that those who have the power to ‘create’ out of
nothing all the money in each country and the whole world and lend it as
stated, have total power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press,
individuals and so on. Therefore the power of Parliment in general, and
especially  with regard to money, is non-existant, and all the true
sovereignty is in the hands of those private individuals who issue all
money"

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

> It is possible that the Rothschilds agreed to have all the blame
> placed on them so there would be an outlet for those observant people
> who discovered the conspiracy. The family appears to have accepted
> that they would be blamed for the conspiracy and this would cause an
> increase in anti-semitism. The Rothschilds may have gone along with
> this in order to gain more power in the circle of powerbrokers.

> It doesn’t seem to occur to the the Rothschilds’ accusers that the
> likelihood of so much power being accumulated by one family is
> infinitely remote. What is never asked is "What was so special about
> the policies of the Rothschilds?"  So they lent money to kings.
> Couldn’t other rich people do that? How come no king ever tried to
> kill one of them to get rid of his debt? There is no recorded event
> anywhere of any type of opposition to Rothschilds’ evil practices. Why
> not? the Knights Templer made enemies and were defeated by their
> enemies. How come the Rothschilds had no enemies who took revenge?
> How is it possible that a family dynasty can attain such power and
> wealth and yet have no enemies?

   I am their enemy.

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

> Another question which needs to be answered is: "Did the Rothschilds
> run the Illuminati on their own?" Did they alone create all the
> intrigue and figure out all the plots and carry out the plans to cause
> the revolutions and wars?

> The running of the conspiracy is so complex, it defies all logic to
> suggest that it can be managed by just only one family. They must have
> had promoters and advocates who were prepared to go along with them.
> Yet there isn’t one recorded event of a rebellion by the people who
> were following them or any other powerbroker competing for the top
> spot. The so-called Rothschilds’ agents, Schiff, Benjamin, Warburg,
> Baruch, all went along without any challenge Rothschilds’ leadership.
> Why? Since when has such power entrenched in one family not met with
> opposition?

> If the conspiracy theory that the Rothschilds with the Illuminati
> created the French revolution is true, and that the War of 1812, the
> Civil War, murder of Abraham Lincoln, the Russian revolution, the
> Russian-Japan war were Rothschild inspired, how is it that hrough all
> of these years the family was able to keep themselves so completely
> hidden from the public and free of blame? Why are they so untouchable?
> Perhaps the near "supermen" status many conspiracy researchers give
> the Rothschilds needs to be reevaluated. It simply isn’t possible for
> one family to be so powerful over a period of 200 years and for one
> family to control everything the way conspiracy researchers present
> it.

> I am prepared to buy that the Rothschilds from their beginnings are
> one of the world’s lowest form of lifes and responsible for the death
> of hundreds of millions of people, Jews included. They may even be a
> devil worshipers.  The entire family is a shame to the Jewish people.
> They have no love for the Jewish people and they have caused much
> hardship for their brethren.  So they are criminals but they are just
> one powerful family out of many.  Why are they being singled out as
> sitting on top of the heap? Who are all the others that we don’t hear
> about?

> How could one family have become so powerful that even the Kings of
> Europe they were lending money to never tried to eliminate the debt by
> eliminating the moneylender? Certainly these heads of state had the
> means, militarily and in other ways, to handle the Rothschilds in
> order not to have to repay debts. However no proof exists anywhere to
> prove that the Rothschilds were behind the creation of the Illuminati.

…

read more »

>    The Jews are leading the world to disaster and Hitler was right.

Are n’t you helping them with your Racism ?  Read below

USCensor

ARE THE ROTHSCHILD BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY?
By: Efraim Menashe

Jerusalem, Israel–It isn’t easy being a conspiracy researcher- let
alone a Jewish conspiracy researcher- when so many Jews are involved
in political intrigue and world domination. This is a fact any
objective thinker must conclude- whether the researcher is a Jew or
not. As a Jew, the decision is harder to accept.

But I guess I am an objective thinker before I am a Jew, and for that
reason I am prepared to publicly admit to all who are reading that
indeed, there is a conspiracy to control and dominate the world, and
that many, many Jews play, and have played a role, in that conspiracy.
For this is not speculation, it is fact. The names are well known to
all:  Rothschild, Warburg, George Soros, Henry Kissinger, the
Bronfmans, Jacob Shiff, Bernard Baruch, Judah Benjamin, etc. However,
one must remember that included in the conspiracy are also the
Rockefellers, J.P. Morgan, Cecil Rhodes, the British Royal Family, the
Vatican, the French and Italian members of the "NWO planning
committee." Most of the players in the NWO arena are not Jews, if all
the members are included.

The problem is that for some reason only the Rothschilds are
associated with being behind the creation of "the Illuminati." All the
conspiracy literature points the sole finger at this family for
creating the Illuminati and causing revolutions in France, Russia, the
US, the murder of Lincoln, the creation of the Federal Reserve, the
crash of l929, the Bank of England, two World Wars: in fact,
everything that supposedly happens in the NWO is carried out via
"agents of Rothschild." It is quite amazing how every conspiracy
researcher whether it is Tex Marrs, David Icke, Guradas, Ralph
Epperson, Eustice Mullins, John Coleman, it doesn’t matter from which
perspective they came to understand the grand conspiracy, they all
agree on one thing that is that the "Rothschilds who are behind
everything."

The Schiffs, the Warburgs, Bernard Baruch, are said to be "agents of
Rothschilds" but this may only mean that no other higher chain of
command has been identified. None of these so-called agents ever
admitted to being an agent, nor do we really know if they were. The
way the conspiracy is described in the revisionist view of history, it
is just assumed that they are, as it is assumed that the Rothschilds
are behind the creation of the Illuminati. I have yet to see any proof
that this is the case. I am not suggesting that the Rothschilds are
not players in the NWO, only that they are far from being the only
ones and it has never been shown by any conspiracy researcher that
they are indeed, "Chairmen of the Board."

It is possible that the Rothschilds agreed to have all the blame
placed on them so there would be an outlet for those observant people
who discovered the conspiracy. The family appears to have accepted
that they would be blamed for the conspiracy and this would cause an
increase in anti-semitism. The Rothschilds may have gone along with
this in order to gain more power in the circle of powerbrokers.

It doesn’t seem to occur to the the Rothschilds’ accusers that the
likelihood of so much power being accumulated by one family is
infinitely remote. What is never asked is "What was so special about
the policies of the Rothschilds?"  So they lent money to kings.
Couldn’t other rich people do that? How come no king ever tried to
kill one of them to get rid of his debt? There is no recorded event
anywhere of any type of opposition to Rothschilds’ evil practices. Why
not? the Knights Templer made enemies and were defeated by their
enemies. How come the Rothschilds had no enemies who took revenge?
How is it possible that a family dynasty can attain such power and
wealth and yet have no enemies?

Another question which needs to be answered is: "Did the Rothschilds
run the Illuminati on their own?" Did they alone create all the
intrigue and figure out all the plots and carry out the plans to cause
the revolutions and wars?

The running of the conspiracy is so complex, it defies all logic to
suggest that it can be managed by just only one family. They must have
had promoters and advocates who were prepared to go along with them.
Yet there isn’t one recorded event of a rebellion by the people who
were following them or any other powerbroker competing for the top
spot. The so-called Rothschilds’ agents, Schiff, Benjamin, Warburg,
Baruch, all went along without any challenge Rothschilds’ leadership.
Why? Since when has such power entrenched in one family not met with
opposition?

If the conspiracy theory that the Rothschilds with the Illuminati
created the French revolution is true, and that the War of 1812, the
Civil War, murder of Abraham Lincoln, the Russian revolution, the
Russian-Japan war were Rothschild inspired, how is it that hrough all
of these years the family was able to keep themselves so completely
hidden from the public and free of blame? Why are they so untouchable?
Perhaps the near "supermen" status many conspiracy researchers give
the Rothschilds needs to be reevaluated. It simply isn’t possible for
one family to be so powerful over a period of 200 years and for one
family to control everything the way conspiracy researchers present
it.

I am prepared to buy that the Rothschilds from their beginnings are
one of the world’s lowest form of lifes and responsible for the death
of hundreds of millions of people, Jews included. They may even be a
devil worshipers.  The entire family is a shame to the Jewish people.
They have no love for the Jewish people and they have caused much
hardship for their brethren.  So they are criminals but they are just
one powerful family out of many.  Why are they being singled out as
sitting on top of the heap? Who are all the others that we don’t hear
about?

How could one family have become so powerful that even the Kings of
Europe they were lending money to never tried to eliminate the debt by
eliminating the moneylender? Certainly these heads of state had the
means, militarily and in other ways, to handle the Rothschilds in
order not to have to repay debts. However no proof exists anywhere to
prove that the Rothschilds were behind the creation of the Illuminati.

My point is that they may have been involved in the affair, but they
aren’t the sole architects of the conspiracy.

Fellow conspiracy researchers: there is no Jewish conspiracy. There
are plenty of Jews wrapped up in the quest for a NWO, but to ascribe
the entire agenda to a small group of Jews, is plainly wrong. The
anti-Semites like to point out "how powerful the Jews are", but are
the Jews as a people so powerful or is a tiny group of Jews dominating
the power?

Are these Jews really the ones in charge of the entire agenda to
enslave the world? Hardly. The notion that there is a cabal of Jews
who sit together once a year and decide how to control the world, and
they do this on behalf of some Jewish entity, or Israel, is what we
are asked to believe. If such a cabal exists, and the anti-Semites say
it has existed for centuries, then where is one recorded historical
event of a group of Jews assembling to plan their control over the
world? There is no proof anywhere showing that The Protocols of Zion
was describing a group of Jews intent on dominating the world so they,
the Jews, would be kings. Indeed the protocols was probably an
accurate description of a group of people bent on world domination.
There may have been some Jews sitting at the table. I believe that. I
just don’t believe that the majority were Jews.  If not, then who are
the others? Who sits at that table other than the selected Jewish
powerbrokers?

There are Jews involved in the conspiracy to subject the world to a
one-world government, no question of that, yet none of them are
representing any Jews other than themselves. We know the Jewish masses
are wonderful, hardworking educated people. The select few who are
rich and are powerbrokers are a disgrace and should be exposed. How
Israel’s leadership has been thoroughly compromised and corrupted by
the international Jewish powerbrokers should also be exposed. Rich,
powerful Jews abroad exploit Israel for the gain of the people they
work for. If these truths were exposed at least the issue would be
confronted and the wound could, at least, start to heal.

Unlike the majority of Jews, I have no reason to respect people like
George Soros or Edgar Bronfman. They don’t represent anyone other than
other powerbrokers. I offer no guilt for these people. They are
gangsters and like all other gangsters, they need to be punished. It
smears the entire Jewish people for these people to claim they are
"Jewish leaders."  I’m one Jew/Israeli who never voted for Bronfman
and object to his involvement in Jewish affairs and Israeli diplomacy.
Jews like Soros and Bronfman are a cancer in the body of the Jewish
people and to the state of Israel. I’m all for exposing these
criminals and letting them face justice. Perhaps that’s the difference
between me and the rest of my fellow Jews: I don’t care if we "wash
our dirty laundry in front of the goyim," we need to wash our dirty
laundry in front of ourselves.

That, fellow conspiracy researchers, is where I end my apologies. I
don’t
…

read more »

news:9l813t$bdg$1@aldebaran.worldonline.fr…
> And the ‘beast’ Albright said to all that :
> Well, you cannot bake an omelet without braking eggs
> (5000 Children dead.)
> She would be the first to stand trail in the hague if we lived in
> a civilised world.
> However, it becomes more and more clear that that’s not the
> case with the USA / Nazi’s leading the world to disaster.

   The Jews are leading the world to disaster and Hitler was right.

—–=  Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News  =—–
http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
 Check out our new Unlimited Server. No Download or Time Limits!
—–==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers!  ==—–

"us censor" <uscen…@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:b2f59bf.0108121516.24201d1d@posting.google.com…

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

> The Secret Behind the Sanctions
> How the U.S. Intentionally Destroyed Iraq’s Water Supply
> by Thomas J. Nagy

> Over the last two years, I’ve discovered documents of the Defense
> Intelligence
> Agency proving beyond a doubt that, contrary to the Geneva Convention,
> the U.S.
> government intentionally used sanctions against Iraq to degrade the
> country’s water supply after the Gulf War. The United States knew the
> cost that civilian Iraqis, mostly children, would pay, and it went
> ahead anyway.

> The primary document, "Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities," is dated
> January 22, 1991. It spells out how sanctions will prevent Iraq from
> supplying clean water to its citizens.

> "Iraq depends on importing specialized equipment and some chemicals to
> purify its water supply, most of which is heavily mineralized and
> frequently brackish to saline,"  the document states. "With no
> domestic sources of both water treatment replacement parts and some
> essential chemicals, Iraq will continue attempts to circumvent United
> Nations Sanctions to import these vital commodities. Failing to secure
> supplies will result in a shortage of pure drinking water for much of
> the population. This could lead to increased incidences, if not
> epidemics, of disease."

> The document goes into great technical detail about the sources and
> quality of Iraq’s water supply. The quality of untreated water
> "generally is poor," and drinking such water "could result in
> diarrhea," the document says. It notes that Iraq’s rivers "contain
> biological materials, pollutants, and are laden with bacteria. Unless
> the water is purified with chlorine, epidemics of such diseases as
> cholera, hepatitis, and typhoid could occur."

> The document notes that the importation of chlorine "has been
> embargoed" by
> sanctions. "Recent reports indicate the chlorine supply is critically
> low."

> Food and medicine will also be affected, the document states. "Food
> processing,
> electronic, and, particularly, pharmaceutical plants require extremely
> pure water that is free from biological contaminants," it says.

> The document addresses possible Iraqi countermeasures to obtain
> drinkable water
> despite sanctions.

> "Iraq conceivably could truck water from the mountain reservoirs to
> urban areas. But the capability to gain significant quantities is
> extremely limited," the document states. "The amount of pipe on hand
> and the lack of pumping stations would limit laying pipelines to these
> reservoirs. Moreover, without chlorine purification, the water still
> would contain biological pollutants. Some affluent Iraqis could obtain
> their own minimally adequate supply of good quality water from
> Northern Iraqi sources. If boiled, the water could be safely consumed.
> Poorer Iraqis and industries requiring large quantities of pure water
> would not be able to meet their needs."

> The document also discounted the possibility of Iraqis using
> rainwater. "Precipitation occurs in Iraq during the winter and spring,
> but it falls primarily in the northern mountains," it says. "Sporadic
> rains, sometimes heavy, fall over the lower plains. But Iraq could not
> rely on rain to provide adequate pure water." As an alternative, "Iraq
> could try convincing the United Nations or individual countries to
> exempt water treatment supplies from sanctions for humanitarian
> reasons," the document says. "It probably also is attempting to
> purchase supplies by using some sympathetic countries as fronts. If
> such attempts fail, Iraqi alternatives are not  adequate for their
> national requirements."

> n cold language, the document spells out what is in store: "Iraq will
> suffer increasing shortages of purified water because of the lack of
> required chemicals and desalination membranes. Incidences of disease,
> including possible epidemics, will become probable unless the
> population were careful to boil water."

> The document gives a timetable for the destruction of Iraq’s water
> supplies. "Iraq’s overall water treatment capability will suffer a
> slow decline, rather than a precipitous halt," it says. "Although Iraq
> is already experiencing a loss of water treatment capability, it
> probably will take at least six months (to June 1991) before the
> system is fully degraded."

> This document, which was partially declassified but unpublicized in
> 1995, can be found on the Pentagon’s web site at http://www.gulflink.osd.mil.
> (I disclosed this document last fall. But the news media showed little
> interest in it. The only reporters I know of who wrote lengthy stories
> on it were Felicity Arbuthnot in the Sunday Herald of Scotland, who
> broke the story, and Charlie Reese of the Orlando Sentinel, who did a
> follow-up.)

> Recently, I have come across other DIA documents that confirm the
> Pentagon’s
> monitoring of the degradation of Iraq’s water supply. These documents
> have not been publicized until now.

> The first one in this batch is called "Disease Information," and is
> also dated January 22,1991. At the top, it says, "Subject: Effects of
> Bombing on Disease Occurrence in Baghdad." The analysis is blunt:
> "Increased incidence of diseases will be attributable to degradation
> of normal preventive medicine, waste disposal, water
> purification/distribution, electricity, and decreased ability to
> control disease outbreaks.   Any urban area in Iraq that has received
> infrastructure damage will have similar problems."

> The document proceeds to itemize the likely outbreaks. It mentions
> "acute diarrhea" brought on by bacteria such as E. coli, shigella, and
> salmonella, or by protozoa such as giardia, which will affect
> "particularly children," or by rotavirus, which will also affect
> "particularly children," a phrase it puts in parentheses. And it cites
> the possibilities of typhoid and cholera outbreaks.

> The document warns that the Iraqi government may "blame the United
> States for
> public health problems created by the military conflict."

> The second DIA document, "Disease Outbreaks in Iraq," is dated
> February 21, 1990, but the year is clearly a typo and should be 1991.
> It states: "Conditions are favorable for communicable disease
> outbreaks, particularly in major urban areas affected by coalition
> bombing." It adds: "Infectious disease prevalence in major Iraqi urban
> areas targeted by coalition bombing (Baghdad, Basrah) undoubtedly has
> increased since the beginning of Desert Storm. . . . Current public
> health problems are attributable to the reduction of normal preventive
> medicine, waste disposal, water purification and distribution,
> electricity, and the decreased ability to control disease outbreaks."

> This document lists the "most likely diseases during next sixty-ninety
> days (descending order): diarrheal diseases (particularly children);
> acute respiratory illnesses (colds and influenza); typhoid; hepatitis
> A (particularly children); measles, diphtheria, and pertussis
> (particularly children); meningitis, including meningococcal
> (particularly children);  cholera (possible, but less likely)."

> Like the previous document, this one warns that the Iraqi government
> might
> "propagandize increases of endemic diseases." The third document in
> this series, "Medical Problems in Iraq," is dated March 15, 1991. It
> says: "Communicable diseases in Baghdad are more widespread than
> usually observed during this time of the year and are linked to the
> poor sanitary conditions (contaminated water supplies and improper
> sewage disposal) resulting from the war.            According to a
> United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)/World Health Organization
> report, the quantity of potable water is less than 5 percent of the
> original supply, there are no operational water and sewage treatment
> plants, and the reported incidence of diarrhea is four times above
> normal levels. Additionally, respiratory infections are on the rise.
> Children particularly have been affected by these diseases." Perhaps
> to put a gloss on things, the document states, "There are indications
> that the situation is improving and that the population is coping with
> the degraded conditions." But it adds: "Conditions in Baghdad remain
> favorable for communicable disease outbreaks."

> The fourth document, "Status of Disease at Refugee Camps," is dated
> May 1991. The summary says, "Cholera and measles have emerged at
> refugee camps. Further
> infectious diseases will spread due to inadequate water treatment and
> poor sanitation."

> The reason for this outbreak is clearly stated again. "The main causes
> of infectious diseases, particularly diarrhea, dysentery, and upper
> respiratory problems, are poor sanitation and unclean water. These
> diseases primarily afflict the old and young children."

> The fifth document, "Health Conditions in Iraq, June 1991," is still
> heavily censored. All I can make out is that the DIA sent a source "to
> assess health conditions and determine the most critical medical needs
> of Iraq. Source observed that Iraqi medical system was in considerable
> disarray, medical facilities had been extensively looted, and almost
> all medicines were in critically short supply."

> In one refugee camp, the document says, "at least 80 percent of the
> population" has diarrhea. At this same camp, named Cukurca, "cholera,
> hepatitis type B, and measles have broken out."

> The protein deficiency disease kwashiorkor was observed in Iraq "for
> the first

…

read more »